You lend to me.
One private lender. One written agreement. At least USD 1,000,000. No equity and no crowdfunding.
A private loan proposal
I am looking for exactly one person willing to fund a long-term experiment in financial education — not by giving money to my children, but by lending capital to me.
Private lender sought: one USD 1,000,000+ unsecured, limited-recourse loan at no more than 1% annual interest.
The principal is not guaranteed. You can lose money.
Before anything else
There are almost certainly better financial opportunities available to you.
I am not trying to make this attractive to many people. I am trying to make it meaningful to one.
I am not looking for someone who thinks this is a good financial deal.
I am looking for one person who thinks this experiment should exist.
Why
I have two children who are now university students.
Before they enter working life, I want them to experience that money can be earned, borrowed, allocated, protected, moved, invested, lost, recovered and repaid.
I want them to understand the difference between spending their lives exchanging time for money and building a foundation where capital can work alongside them.
My hope is simple: if they learn early enough how to make money work, perhaps they will be able to spend more of their lives on the work they truly want to do — rather than only on the work required to survive.
This is not about making them rich quickly. It is about giving them one real experience of moving money before adulthood makes every mistake more expensive.
The structure
They will never control the money you lend me.
One private lender. One written agreement. At least USD 1,000,000. No equity and no crowdfunding.
The borrowed capital is kept separate and invested conservatively and liquidly, with preservation of recoverable value as the first priority.
Interest, taxes, actual third-party costs, liquidity needs and an appropriate reserve come first. Only a genuinely separable surplus may become educational capital.
They borrow it from me under separate arrangements, invest it themselves, experience the consequences and are expected to repay what they borrowed.
A simple illustration
Suppose, purely for illustration, that the dedicated portfolio produces a 5% gross return during one year.
That does not mean USD 50,000 goes to my children.
First come the agreed lender interest, taxes, actual external expenses, liquidity requirements and the amount that should remain untouched.
If only USD 10,000 can prudently be separated, then approximately USD 10,000 becomes the maximum potential educational capital for that cycle.
If the safely separable amount is zero, the educational budget is zero. A bad year is also part of the lesson.
Your risk
The loan is unsecured.
The intended structure is limited-recourse: my repayment obligation would be limited to the net realizable value of the dedicated portfolio, after actual and documented third-party costs required to hold, liquidate and return the assets, as precisely defined in the final agreement.
If the portfolio loses value, you may receive less than the amount you originally lent. I would not make up that shortfall from unrelated personal assets.
You can lose principal.
If that possibility is unacceptable, please do not make this loan.
I do not intend to charge an investment-management fee. The cost deductions are meant to represent real external costs, not a way to extract money from the portfolio.
When things go badly
The final agreement would define a predetermined liquidation rule.
If the portfolio approaches or reaches that agreed protection threshold, educational distributions stop and the portfolio is liquidated according to the rule.
The resulting net balance is returned to you. That repayment ends the loan.
If the balance is below the original principal, the difference is your loss.
I do not increase risk in an attempt to win it back. I do not ask you for more money.
The experiment simply failed, and we end it.
The children
If they invest successfully, they repay what they borrowed from me. Their gains are theirs.
If they fail, the debt does not magically disappear. But I will not force a university student to abandon education or basic living needs merely to repay an unsuccessful investment lesson.
If I later forgive part of that debt because repayment has genuinely become unrealistic, that decision is separate from your loan and would be handled under the applicable tax and legal rules at that time.
Control
The lender does not buy or sell securities, approve individual trades, direct portfolio decisions, or hold a veto over them.
The definitive agreement may establish permitted asset classes, risk limits, reporting, valuation methods and the liquidation mechanism in advance.
Within those agreed boundaries, investment decisions remain mine.
What this is not
I am looking for one lending relationship with one person.
What I will not do
Before any money moves
If a real lender appears, the structure must be reviewed and documented properly before funds move.
Both parties should be free to appoint their own independent lawyers, accountants and tax advisers.
The final agreement would need to define at least: applicable law, lending currency, permitted investments, portfolio segregation, net realizable value, deductible actual costs, interest calculation, valuation method, liquidation threshold, liquidation procedure, repayment procedure, reporting, tax treatment, death or incapacity, and termination.
If the structure cannot be implemented lawfully in the relevant jurisdictions, we do not do it.
Why only one?
I do not want one thousand people lending USD 1,000.
I do not want ten people lending USD 100,000.
I want one person whose capital makes the entire experiment possible.
One lender.
One borrower.
One dedicated portfolio.
One long-term experiment.
The only question that matters
If you are genuinely interested, I am more interested in hearing why this proposal interests you than in receiving a generic financing offer.
Why?